Human rights are in the court of public opinion.  
Politicians claim to be sensitive to the voice of the 
electorate -- that's us, but they are not hearing us.
We have been drowned out for some time now by a deluge 
of voices who claim to be right (correct) but are 
really from the right (direction) of the political 
spectrum.
Why aren't we being heard?  The biggest reason is that 
many of us are not talking; we are not talking loud 
enough or often enough and we are not actively support-
ing human rights advocacy groups such as Women's Clin-
ics, NARL, Planned Parenthood etc., so they can shout 
aloud for us.    
Whether it's a CNN viewers comment or C-Span -- the 
great majority of the voices heard are NOT OURS.  Brian 
Lamb of C-Span tries very hard to allow all callers an 
opportunity to get their views heard.  He started a 
policy of taking calls in order, ie, have the caller 
declare their Party affiliation: "Crats", "Pubs" or 
"Indys".  In an interview, he expressed his remorse 
that even this did not work, because the callers of one 
Party would ID themselves as Crats or Indy's and then 
when they got on the air would show themselves as 
mean-spirited Pubs.
So, OK.  It is a fact that many Pubs have the money to 
wait on the phone.  They have the time also, but the 
biggest factor is that they have the desire, the will 
to drown us out -- and they are doing so.  We don't 
mean just on the national radio programs such as         
Limbaugh.  We mean everywhere.  Check out the letters 
to your local paper and see whose views predominate.  
Are yours represented?
Nearly every town has a Talk-radio-show now.  The great 
majority of callers are anti-woman Pubs.  That is where 
the battle for your human rights is taking place every 
single day and your views are heard only very seldom.  
We do have some great columnists such as Molly Ivins or 
Ellen Goodman but do we support their views with calls 
to the Talk Radio programs or letters to the editor?
Face it.  We are in trouble.  The Senate is lacking 
only 3 votes to remove part of YOUR body from your 
control and put it in the hands of the political/reli-
gious terrorists.  CNN reported that the *** majority 
of Senators that have changed their vote in the last 
couple of years are Catholic.***  They are reacting to 
the demands of a religious/foreign principality  and to 
"public pressure", the "ground-swell" of the electorate 
against a human right -- a woman's health and welfare.  
WHERE IS OUR VOICE IN ALL OF THIS?  Why is the Consti-
tution being ignored?  Does it not still demand the 
separation of church and state?
Goodman's column recently reiterated some things that 
we should all be shouting out.  "The bill is not really 
about banning one abortion procedure.  If D&X is the 
first method banned without exceptions, it won't be the 
last."  Understand that the goal of the 
political/religious factions is to *totally eliminate* 
a woman's reproductive rights and freedom.
Recently the country of Iran elected a moderate for 
their president.  This country has no separation of 
church and state -- religion controls.  In this elec-
tion, young people and women formed a gendergap that 
protested the extreme religions restrictions by elect-
ing a moderate.  
We are informed that moderate in Iran does not mean the 
same as moderate in our country.  For example, one of 
the reasons that this newly elected president is called 
"moderate" is because he does not demand that his wife 
get his permission before leaving the house.
Monday, May 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment